This Stage used 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese expert system business that establishes open-source large language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the business in 2023 and works as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 design provides actions comparable to other modern big language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a considerably lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of a similar LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were developed amidst United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were meant to restrict the capability of these 2 countries to establish innovative AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its first complimentary chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 design, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had surpassed ChatGPT as the most-downloaded free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share price to come by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against larger and more established rivals has been referred to as „upending AI“, [8] constituting „the very first chance at what is becoming a global AI area race“, [11] and ushering in „a new period of AI brinkmanship“. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative synthetic intelligence algorithms, models, and training details open-source, allowing its code to be easily offered for usage, adjustment, watching, and creating files for building functions. [13] The business reportedly vigorously hires young AI researchers from leading Chinese universities, [8] and hires from outside the computer technology field to diversify its models‘ knowledge and capabilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading because the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while attending Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund concentrated on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative artificial intelligence chatbot open source, indicating its code is easily offered for usage, adjustment, and viewing. This includes authorization to access and use the source code, as well as style files, for building functions. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had built up a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip constraints on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer began an artificial basic intelligence laboratory dedicated to research establishing AI tools separate from High-Flyer’s monetary company. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the investors, the laboratory became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital companies were unwilling in providing financing as it was not likely that it would be able to create an exit in a brief time period. [15]

After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which used strong performance for a low cost, DeepSeek ended up being called the catalyst for China’s AI design price war. It was quickly called the „Pinduoduo of AI„, and other significant tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the rate of their AI models to compete with the business. Despite the low rate charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its rivals that were losing cash. [20]

DeepSeek is focused on research study and has no comprehensive plans for commercialization; [20] this likewise allows its innovation to prevent the most strict provisions of China’s AI regulations, such as needing consumer-facing innovation to abide by the federal government’s controls on details. [3]

DeepSeek’s hiring preferences target technical capabilities instead of work experience, resulting in many brand-new hires being either recent university graduates or designers whose AI careers are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the company hires individuals without any computer science background to help its technology understand other topics and knowledge locations, including having the ability to generate poetry and carry out well on the infamously hard Chinese college admissions examinations (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its very first series of design, DeepSeek-Coder, which is offered free of charge to both scientists and business users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license contract („DeepSeek license“) regarding „open and accountable downstream use“ for the design itself. [21]

They are of the same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series consists of 8 models, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of instruction information. This produced the Instruct models.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, connected by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek launched the DeepSeek-LLM series of models, with 7B and 67B criteria in both Base and Chat forms (no Instruct was released). It was established to take on other LLMs readily available at the time. The paper declared benchmark outcomes greater than most open source LLMs at the time, specifically Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the model itself. [27]

The architecture was essentially the very same as those of the Llama series. They used the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text obtained by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat versions of the two Base designs was likewise launched concurrently, obtained by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B parameters (2.7 B activated per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the exact same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared similar performance with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variation of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with „shared experts“ that are constantly queried, and „routed experts“ that might not be. They found this to aid with professional balancing. In basic MoE, some specialists can end up being extremely depended on, while other experts may be seldom used, wasting criteria. Attempting to stabilize the specialists so that they are similarly utilized then causes professionals to duplicate the same capability. They proposed the shared specialists to find out core capabilities that are often used, and let the routed professionals to discover the peripheral capabilities that are rarely utilized. [28]

In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K math issues and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step services. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The reward design was a procedure reward design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd approach. [30] This reward design was then utilized to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics concerns „related to GSM8K and MATH“. The benefit model was continually updated during training to avoid reward hacking. This led to the RL design.

V2

In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series consists of 4 designs, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 larger designs were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This resulted in DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL using GRPO in 2 stages. The very first stage was trained to solve mathematics and coding problems. This stage utilized 1 benefit model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The 2nd phase was trained to be handy, safe, and follow guidelines. This phase utilized 3 reward designs. The helpfulness and safety reward models were trained on human choice data. The rule-based benefit design was manually set. All qualified benefit designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the released version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They chose 2-staged RL, since they found that RL on reasoning data had „special qualities“ different from RL on basic data. For example, RL on reasoning could enhance over more training steps. [31]

The two V2-Lite models were smaller sized, and skilled likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to assist „further research and advancement on MLA and DeepSeekMoE“. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 designs were considerably modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the basic attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and used the mixture of experts (MoE) variant previously released in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was more affordable than its peers with a price of 2 RMB for every million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they released 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to produce 20K code-related and 30K math-related instruction data, then integrated with an instruction dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for mathematics problems was computed by comparing to the ground-truth label. The benefit for code issues was produced by a benefit design trained to predict whether a program would pass the unit tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was launched in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by integrating DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they launched a base model DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is essentially the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mostly English and Chinese. It contained a higher ratio of math and programming than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of thinking (mathematics, programs, reasoning) and non-reasoning (creative writing, roleplay, easy question answering) data. Reasoning data was created by „expert designs“. Non-reasoning data was generated by DeepSeek-V2.5 and examined by humans. – The „professional designs“ were trained by beginning with an unspecified base design, then SFT on both information, and artificial data generated by an internal DeepSeek-R1 model. The system prompt asked the R1 to show and confirm during thinking. Then the specialist models were RL using an unspecified reward function.
– Each specialist model was trained to create just artificial reasoning data in one specific domain (mathematics, programming, logic).
– Expert models were used, instead of R1 itself, given that the output from R1 itself suffered „overthinking, poor format, and excessive length“.

4. Model-based benefit models were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice information including both last reward and chain-of-thought causing the final benefit. The reward design produced reward signals for both questions with unbiased but free-form answers, and questions without unbiased answers (such as innovative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both reward designs and rule-based reward. The rule-based reward was computed for mathematics problems with a last answer (put in a box), and for programs issues by unit tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek group carried out extensive low-level engineering to accomplish efficiency. They utilized mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) instead of the basic 32-bit, requiring unique GEMM routines to accumulate accurately. They used a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the direct layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They lessened the interaction latency by overlapping extensively calculation and interaction, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU interaction. They lowered interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the exact maker each professional was on in order to avoid particular makers being queried regularly than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing methods. [37]

After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 exceeded Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being available through DeepSeek’s API, along with via a chat interface after logging in. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for rational inference, mathematical reasoning, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek claimed that it went beyond efficiency of OpenAI o1 on standards such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal mentioned when it used 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached a solution much faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company likewise released some „DeepSeek-R1-Distill“ models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but rather are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic data created by R1. [47]

A discussion between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant resolves it. The assistant first thinks about the reasoning process in the mind and after that supplies the user with the answer. The reasoning procedure and answer are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking process here address here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained specifically using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they used no model-based reward. All reward functions were rule-based, „generally“ of two types (other types were not defined): precision benefits and format rewards. Accuracy reward was whether a boxed answer is correct (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for programs). Format reward was checking whether the design puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has issues with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to attend to these concerns and additional enhance thinking: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on „thousands“ of „cold-start“ information all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the same RL procedure as R1-Zero, but also with a „language consistency reward“ to encourage it to react monolingually. This produced an internal design not released.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning information from the internal model, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the produced reasoning had a wrong last answer, then it is gotten rid of). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, factual QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K artificial data for 2 epochs.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for thinking tasks) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K information synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable way as step 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and responses

DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had exceeded ChatGPT as the highest-rated totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot reportedly addresses questions, fixes reasoning problems and composes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 uses significantly fewer resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as numerous as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to require just about 2,000 GPUs, specifically the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is approximately one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta spent building its latest AI innovation. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at fairly very little cost has actually been acknowledged as potentially challenging the international supremacy of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a „Sputnik moment“ for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 model was apparently „on par with“ among OpenAI’s most current models when used for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen likewise explained R1 as „AI’s Sputnik minute“. [51]

DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media widely applauded DeepSeek as a nationwide property. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with experts and asked him to offer viewpoints and recommendations on a draft for comments of the annual 2024 federal government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of limited resources has actually highlighted prospective limitations of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, that include export restrictions on innovative AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI designs as a result „stimulated market turmoil“ [57] and caused shares in significant international technology companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech companies also sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A worldwide selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 model, had actually led to tape losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, an overall of $1 trillion of value was rubbed out American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had mixed reactions to DeepSeek’s success and efficiency. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose companies are included in the United States government-backed „Stargate Project“ to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek „super outstanding“. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk revealed hesitation of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to utilize the design in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek limited its new user registration to contact number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a „large-scale“ cyberattack interfered with the appropriate functioning of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have observed that the main application programming user interface (API) version of R1, which runs from servers located in China, uses censorship mechanisms for subjects that are thought about politically delicate for the federal government of China. For example, the design refuses to address concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might initially produce a response, but then deletes it soon later on and changes it with a message such as: „Sorry, that’s beyond my present scope. Let’s talk about something else.“ [72] The integrated censorship systems and constraints can only be gotten rid of to a limited extent in the open-source version of the R1 model. If the „core socialist worths“ specified by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are terminated. [74] When tested by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 explained Taiwan as „an inalienable part of China’s area,“ and mentioned: „We securely oppose any form of ‚Taiwan independence‘ separatist activities and are devoted to accomplishing the complete reunification of the motherland through serene methods.“ [75] In January 2025, Western scientists were able to deceive DeepSeek into giving certain responses to some of these topics by requesting in its response to switch particular letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and personal privacy

Some professionals fear that the federal government of China could use the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading disinformation, surveillance and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s personal privacy terms state „We save the information we gather in protected servers found in the People’s Republic of China … We might gather your text or audio input, prompt, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you provide to our design and Services“. Although the data storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired post reports this as security concerns. [80] In action, the Italian data protection authority is looking for extra information on DeepSeek’s collection and use of personal data, and the United States National Security Council revealed that it had begun a nationwide security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government banned the usage of DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened an inquiry into DeepSeek’s usage of individual details. [83]

Expert system market in China.

Notes

^ a b c The variety of heads does not equal the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required picking „Deep Think allowed“, and every user might utilize it just 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). „China’s inexpensive, open AI design DeepSeek delights scientists“. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). „The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world ready to blow“. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). „How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Competing With Silicon Valley Giants“. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). „DeepSeek’s cheaper designs and weaker chips call into question trillions in AI facilities costs“. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). „Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may hit India’s AI ambitions“. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). „Nvidia investigation signals widening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly“. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). „Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe“. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). „What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?“. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). „China’s DeepSeek AI dethrones ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you must understand“. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). „What is DeepSeek, and why is it causing Nvidia and other stocks to slump?“. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). „Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants“. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). „Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.“ The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). „ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key“. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). „How a leading Chinese AI design overcame US sanctions“. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). „Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker“. ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). „Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.“ CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).“ [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says“. Yicai Global. Archived from the original on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). „Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI models are trained“. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). „The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer“. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). „Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race“. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ „DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder“. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ „DeepSeek Coder“. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ „deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face“. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ „config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main“. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ „config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary“. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ „deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face“. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ „config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main“. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). „Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s new AI design surpasses Meta, OpenAI products“. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). „DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outperforms Llama and Qwen on launch“. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). „DeepSeek’s new AI design appears to be among the best ‚open‘ oppositions yet“. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ „Deepseek Log in page“. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ „News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: letting loose supercharged thinking power!“. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). „DeepSeek’s first thinking model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance“. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). „Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast“. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ „Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce“. GitHub. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ „Chinese AI startup DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store“. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). „American AI has reached its Sputnik minute“. The Hill. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). „‚ Sputnik moment‘: $1tn cleaned off US stocks after Chinese firm unveils AI chatbot“ – through The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). „Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets“. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). „What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business“. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ „DeepSeek postures an obstacle to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley“. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). „Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika states“. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). „量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了“ AI界拼多多““. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). „Chinese AI business’s AI design development highlights limitations of US sanctions“. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ „DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot triggers US market chaos, cleaning $500bn off Nvidia“. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). „Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap“. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). „DeepSeek triggers international AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value“. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). „DeepSeek, Calling It ‚Impressive‘ but Staying Skeptical“. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). „Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as „extremely remarkable“: „We need to take the developments out of China very, really seriously““. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). „OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek design ‚excellent'“. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). „Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‚wake-up call‘ after tech stocks slide“. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). „Johnson slams China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement „favorable““. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). „China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street“ – through NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). „Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders state on DeepSeek’s disruption“. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ „Elon Musk ‚concerns‘ DeepSeek’s claims, recommends huge Nvidia GPU infrastructure“. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. „Big AWS consumers, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs“. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). „DeepSeek struck with ‚massive‘ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores“. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. „DeepSeek momentarily restricted brand-new sign-ups, citing ‚massive harmful attacks'“. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). „Chinese AI has actually sparked a $1 trillion panic – and it does not care about totally free speech“. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). „DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot“. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). „We experimented with DeepSeek. It worked well, till we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan“. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ „The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, development and the rise of mayhem“. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). „Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, giving the AI race its ‚Sputnik moment'“. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). „China’s DeepSeek AI positions formidable cyber, data privacy dangers“. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). „Experts advise caution over usage of Chinese AI DeepSeek“. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). „DeepSeek’s success has painted a big TikTok-shaped target on its back“. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ „Privacy policy“. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). „DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China“. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ „Italy regulator looks for information from DeepSeek on information defense“. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). „White House examines impact of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, authorities says“. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.